Design
Define requirements, constraints, trust boundaries, architecture, technical decisions, and success criteria before implementation.
CLOUD ARCHITECT LAB
Cloud Architect Lab is a practical engineering framework for turning cloud and AI learning into documented, implemented, and validated architecture case studies.
Each case study connects requirements, architecture, engineering decisions, Infrastructure as Code, validation evidence, and lessons learned into one traceable body of work.
THE CAL METHOD
Cloud Architect Lab uses a repeatable engineering lifecycle to transform technical learning into practical architecture case studies.
Define requirements, constraints, trust boundaries, architecture, technical decisions, and success criteria before implementation.
Implement the approved design using Infrastructure as Code, reusable modules, version control, and clearly separated engineering concerns.
Compare the deployed environment with the documented architecture, verify expected behavior, and capture evidence before making claims.
Share the architecture, implementation, decisions, tradeoffs, validation results, and lessons that should influence future designs.
Design intent guides the code—not the other way around.
Validation demonstrates that the deployed system matches the design.
Every case study improves the standards used by the next one.
CASE STUDIES
Each Cloud Architect Lab case study is designed, implemented, documented, and validated as a reusable engineering reference.
CAL-005
Evidence as Data.
Evaluation by Evidence.
Mermaid • Deterministic Parsing • Controlled Rendering • AI Evaluation
Preserves architecture evidence through deterministic Mermaid extraction, then tests whether multiple AI evaluators can detect explicit defects and missing required relationships.
View Case Study →CAL-004
Architecture as Code.
Evaluation by Evidence.
Mermaid • Governed Knowledge • Structured Findings • AI Evaluation
Tests grounded architecture conformance evaluation: whether AI can inspect machine-readable architecture against authoritative requirements and support its findings with evidence and citations.
View Case Study →